The Courts decision Considering all the preceding

Roselin67

Alevel exceeds the level of the average gross salary for the economy used to base the state social insurance budget. With regard to the fifth question regarding the right to an effective remedy and the observance of the principles of equivalence and effectiveness Article of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union as well as the principles of equivalence and effectiveness must be interpreted in the sense that they do not oppose in circumstances such as those in the main case so that a national court does not have the possibility to review a final judgment delivered in a civil action if this judgment proves to be incompatible with an interpretation of Union law retained of the .


Court after the date on which the said decision remained final given Country Email List that such a possibility exists with regard to final court decisions incompatible with Union law issued in the framework of actions of an administrative nature. considerations we propose the Court to answer the Alba Iulia Court of Appeal as follows The Memorandum of Understanding between the European Community and Romania concluded in Bucharest and Brussels on June must be considered an act adopted by the institutions of the Union within the meaning of.



Article TFEU The Court is competent to interpret it. This memorandum must be interpreted in the sense that it does not require the adoption of national legislation such as the one under discussion in the main litigation which provides for the prohibition of the cumulation of the net pension from the public sector with the income obtained from activities carried out within public institutions if its level exceeds the level of the average gross salary on the economy used to base the state social insurance budget . Article of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union must.